UKRI includes AHRC, BBSRC, ESRC, EPSRC, MRC, NERC, STFC research councils, plus Innovate UK and Research England.

UKRI expects research data arising from its funding to be made as open as possible and as restricted as necessary. Good research data management practices should be followed throughout your project. UKRI has seven Common principles on research data. 

If your award is from a research council, you will normally need to follow that council’s research data sharing policy and guidance. When you apply for funding, you may be asked to include a data management plan and costs for research data sharing and management activities. 

AHRC do not have a standalone data policy; instead, follow the UKRI common principles on data sharing. For full guidance, see the AHRC Funding Guide. 

BHF provides a policy on patient data in medical research. Any BHF-funded clinical trial must be registered prospectively (before it starts to recruit participants) and when you register, you must include (among other things) a data sharing plan as part of the trial registration, in line with the 2017 ICMJE requirements on data sharing statements for clinical trials.

BHF expects  the main findings to be published in a peer-reviewed journal or platform within 24 months of primary study completion. Data underlying your research publications must be made accessible to other researchers preferably at the time of publication but at the latest 12 months after publication.

It  does not provide a specific data archiving policy. Grant holders need to understand and adhere to the BHF Standard Conditions of Grant.  

"Safeguards should be in place to respect the confidentiality of patients, while also ensuring that medical researchers can gain access to patient data within a secure environment."

A list of all CRUK policies for grant holders, including their Data sharing and management policy.

When applying for funding, CRUK requires grant applicants to provide a data management and sharing plan (see Guidance for researchers on writing data sharing plans) as part of their application which aligns with FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) data principles and CRUK's Research Data Strategy. This plan will be reviewed as part of the funding decision.

Any applicants who consider that the data arising from their proposal will not be suitable for sharing should discuss these reasons with the CRUK Research Data Strategy team (researchdata@cancer.org.uk), with a view to developing a data sharing plan that meets the needs of all those involved.

Investigators carrying out research involving human participants must ensure that consent for data sharing is obtained from participants; research data should be anonymised prior to sharing.

Research data should be available for sharing for a minimum period of five years from the end of a research grant.

CRUK also issued a list of FAQ on data sharing.

In 2015, we invited CRUK to discuss their data sharing requirements with researchers at Cambridge. These blog posts summarise these discussions:

Charities' perspective on data management and sharing

Questions and answers

Guidance for ERC projects falling under Horizon 2020 (2014-2020) can be found here. Since 2017, all Horizon 2020 projects are part of the Open Research Data Pilot by default. The Principal Investigator must: 

• Develop a data management plan in the first 6 months of the project and keep it up-to-date throughout their project
• Deposit their research data in a suitable research data repository
• Make sure third parties can freely access, mine, exploit, reproduce and disseminate their data
• Make clear what tools will be needed to use the raw data to validate research results, or provide the tools themselves

Horizon 2020 ran from 2014-2020 and has now been succeeded by Horizon Europe. 

Guidance for ERC projects falling under Horizon Europe (2020-2027) can be found here. In Horizon Europe, beneficiaries must manage the digital research data generated in the action (‘data’) responsibly, in line with the FAIR principles, and should at least do the following:

• Prepare a Data Management Plan (DMP) and keep it updated throughout the course of the project.
• DMPs need to be submitted to ERC within 6 months of project implementation (Refer to the ERC DMP template for guidance)
• Deposit data in a trusted repository and provide open access to it (‘as open as possible, as closed as necessary’)
• Provide information (via the same repository) about any research output or any other tools and instruments needed to re-use or validate the data

See 'Open Science' section in the guidelines (pg. 40) on mandatory and recommended Open Science practices, and how proposals will be assessed. Some highlights:

• Open access to research data is required under the premise 'as open as possible as close as necessary' (i.e. there can be exceptions).
• Providing open access to research outputs beyond publications and data is recommended (e.g. software tools, models, apps, etc.).
• Open data costs should be budgeted in the proposal.

EPSRC-funded research data is a public good produced in the public interest, and should be made freely and openly available with as few restrictions as possible in a timely and responsible manner.

EPSRC has a strict policy on research data sharing. We prepared separate, dedicated guidelines to help you achieve compliance with EPSRC expectations.

Also, please have a look at our list of FAQ, which was developed in consultation with researchers at the University of Cambridge and with Ben Ryan from the EPSRC in 2015. Following these discussions we published a blog post clarifying the EPSRC policy on data management and sharing.

Grant applicants planning to generate data must submit a data management and sharing plan as part of the grant application process. The cost of data management and data preparation for sharing must be included in the grant proposal. 

Check the word limit for the data management and sharing section of your overall grant/fellowship application before you start - it could be only 500 words.

Research data must be deposited within three months of the end of the award, with the UK Data Service or another suitable data repository. If you deposit in a repository which is not the UK Data Service, you still need to create a metadata record in UK Data Service ReShare and submit metadata relating to the grant and data collection through this service. 

There may be legal, ethical or commercial constraints to data sharing; these should be considered in detail before commencing research with the aim of maximising data sharing. For data obtained from human participants, you must seek to secure consent for data sharing or alternatively appropriately anonymise the data or discuss secure access mechanisms to make sharing possible. 

Research data should be accompanied by high-quality documentation and metadata. The data that support published research findings must be deposited at the same time; the publication should reference where the data can be found and accessed, ideally via a formal citation.  

Where a delay in dissemination of deposited data is needed to allow grant holders to publish their research findings, an embargo period can be applied to the data. 

A new 2025 Open Access Policy takes effect from 1 January 2025. This policy has been expanded to apply to all published research funded, in whole or in part, by the foundation and will apply to any underlying data upon the availability of the funded manuscripts. 

Data supporting accepted articles must be made immediately and as openly available as possible upon article publication.

Accepted articles must have a Data Availability Statement that describes where to find primary metadata, associated metadata, original software and any additional materials needed to understand, assess and replicate the reported findings (it should not refer readers/reviewers to contact an author to obtain the data; it should explain where the data can be found).

The Open Access Policy gives guidance for grantees on how to meet the FAIR Data Principles.

Best practice is to deposit data in a discipline-specific repository; where not available deposit in your institutional repository or in a generalist repository.

The Gates Open Research website has Data Guidelines for sharing your data which provide information about data you need to include, where your data can be stored, and how your data should be presented.

See comprehensive RDM Guidance for researchers. 

Data must be made available with as few restrictions as possible, to maximise the value of the data, improve research reproducibility and for patient and public benefit. Data must be shared in a timely and responsible manner. Peer-reviewed publications must include a data access statement. 

Full funding proposals and funding reviews should include a Data Management Plan (DMP) and details of planned data-sharing activities in line with this policy. Proposals should be explicit in highlighting costs relating to data collecting or generating, curation, sharing and archiving as distinct from the costs of the primary research. 

Data should be appropriately curated throughout its lifecycle and data sharing must include appropriate metadata to ensure that it is findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR).  

For research involving personal or confidential data, appropriate research governance (ethical, legal and institutional) that facilitates data sharing must be considered and implemented throughout the research lifecycle. Participant information sheets and consent forms must be clear about how the research team will make data available for data sharing.

MRC recognises that for legal, ethical, or contractual reasons, some datasets cannot be shared beyond the primary research. When this is the case, the reasons for this should be made clear in funding proposals and reviews, and data access statements. 

MRC is a co-signatory to the WHO joint statement on public disclosure of results from clinical trials, which supports the timely public disclosure of results from all clinical trials. 

“NIH encourages the sharing of data whenever possible. Sharing scientific data accelerates biomedical research discovery, in part, by enabling validation of research results, providing accessibility to high-value datasets, and promoting data reuse for future research studies.”

A new NIH Data Management and Sharing policy came into effect on 25 January 2023. The DMS applies to all research, funded or conducted in whole or in part by NIH, that results in the generation of scientific data. Researchers are encouraged to establish what types of projects fall under the DMS policy and how NIH handles sharing of proprietary data.

Under the DMS policy, NIH expects that investigators and institutions:

• Plan and budget for the managing and sharing of data;
• Submit a DMS plan for review when applying for funding;
• Comply with the approved DMS plan.

(Individual NIH Institutes, Centers, or Offices may have additional policies and expectations).

Important note: NIH Grants - foreign subrecipients must provide copies of all lab notebooks, data and documentation. Please read the information linked to above and contact the Research Data team if you require support with this. Further information from the NIH on how foreign subawards are affected by the new policy (including video updates) is given on their Subawards website. 

The NIHR strongly supports appropriate sharing of data, to help deliver research that maximises benefits to patients  and the wider public, and health and care system. Data sharing statements must be included when publishing the findings of the research describing how to access the underpinning research data. Data management and access plans (DAMPs, synonymous with DMPs) are required for appropriate funded studies across all NIHR funding programmes contracted from 1 July 2023.

Sharing data in a repository is encouraged. Publications must include a data access statement, describing how underpinning data can be accessed. 

Link to all NIHR policies and guidelines. Refer to NIHR Open Research Data guidelines for guidance on data sharing, selecting repositories and adding Data Availability Statements (DAS) to your research outputs.

"Data resulting from publicly funded research should be made publicly available after a limited period, unless there are specific reasons (e.g. legislation, ethical, privacy and security) why this should not happen."

Research data supporting publications should be made available within 6 months of the publication date.

Research data should be retained for at least 10 years from the completion of the project.

"For data that by their nature cannot be re-measured (e.g. earth observations), effort should be made to retain them ‘in perpetuity’"

Data management plans are mandatory for most grant applications. STFC recommends that data management plans be formulated following the guidance provided by the Digital Curation Centre http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/data-management-plans. STFC (SC Department) can provide advice upon request.

"As a minimum, the data underpinning research papers should be made available to other researchers at the time of publication, as well as any original software that is required to view datasets or to replicate analyses. Where research data relates to public health emergencies, researchers must share quality-assured interim and final data as rapidly and widely as possible, and in advance of journal publication." 

Anyone applying for Wellcome funding must consider their approach to managing and sharing anticipated outputs at the research proposal stage. Applicants will need to include an outputs management plan. This is reviewed when making a funding decision. They will fund any justified costs for delivering the plan as part of funding the research."

Wellcome Trust's Open Access policy states that all publications that report original research, which has been supported in whole, or in part, by Wellcome must include a data availability statement, in line with our data, software and materials management and sharing policy.

In 2015, we invited the Wellcome Trust to discuss their data sharing requirements with researchers at Cambridge. These blog posts summarise these discussions:

Charities' perspective on data management and sharing

Questions and answers